AI interviewer
Participant
AI interviewer
Participant
Qualiask · AI interview research
Individual interviews take time and people. Surveys are easy to share, but rarely follow an unexpected answer further.
Let participants talk with an AI interviewer in their own time. Hear specific experiences without attending every conversation, then explore the material around your research question.
The studies, people and analysis results below are fictional examples illustrating how Qualiask works.
Hear more people's experiences
Share a link and let many people participate at once. Guided by your research goals, AI follows each person's answers, helping a broad comment unfold into a specific experience.
AI interviewer
Participant
AI interviewer
Participant
AI interviewer
Participant
AI interviewer
Participant
Follow-ups develop from each person's answers, bringing specific experiences into view.
Quick responses, within the conversation
AI can offer choices based on the conversation to help people recall, compare or choose what to discuss first. Tap when a short response fits; explain in your own words when there is more to say.
Single and multiple choice, scales, numbers, ranking and open text. The format follows the question, with room for free expression.
Participant
Which part of what you just mentioned would you like to explore first?
Or just type your own answer below.
Prepare around your question
These interviews begin with a research plan you prepare with AI. In your browser, clarify whom you want to understand and what decisions the study should inform, bringing the background, ideas and methods you already have.
Student activities / Welcome event
Fictional study · Discuss the purpose and shape a plan you can keep editing.
An interview plan, developed together
The plan gives direction. Follow-up questions develop from each person's answers.
Another way in · MCP
Let your agent use material you authorize to prepare and update a cloud study. Qualiask then hosts the interviews.
“Use the event schedule to add questions about speaking in the small-group discussion.”
Write the prepared changes to Qualiask. There is no need to upload your entire local collection or chat history.
Before a real study begins
Explain the study's use, identity visibility and withdrawal before participation. Interview material is de-identified before researchers read and analyze it.
Participation, identity visibility and material access each follow their applicable settings and permissions.
De-identification illustration · Fictional material
I'm Alex Lin. People kept talking in the discussion. I couldn't find an opening.
I'm [participant]. People kept talking in the discussion. I couldn't find an opening.
Anonymity depends on study settings; de-identification and identity visibility are different rules. Withdrawal deletes the interview and its individual analyses. Existing aggregate reports remain. This example only illustrates a name replacement, not a guarantee that every identity clue is unrecognizable.
Once the interview material comes back
Once interviews are collected and de-identified, what do you want to understand? Develop an analysis perspective with AI, then apply it to selected interviews. Keep the evidence and open questions for each experience, and revisit the material from other perspectives.
You can also create perspectives such as “Unmet needs” to read the same material again.
Perspective: Experiences of speaking
Apply to these interviews
Shows prewritten examples; no real analysis runs.
Welcome event · Interview A · Fictional result example
From the material
Wanted to know how a team of two or three could use the method. Others kept speaking, and the question went unasked.
Still to explore
Were other ways of asking available or attempted?
Welcome event · Interview B · Fictional result example
From the material
The question concerned personal experience. The participant explicitly preferred a private conversation or writing the question down.
Still to explore
How could those ways of communicating be offered so this participant would use them?
Keep the evidence for each interview, with questions that deserve further exploration.
Bring material together around a new question
Combine relevant existing results across studies, interviews and analysis perspectives. Compare what they share, how circumstances differ and what still needs a follow-up.
Keep building within one project, maintaining background and adapting existing research plans as studies accumulate.
Welcome event
| Interview | Speaking | Unmet needs |
|---|---|---|
| Interview A | ||
| Interview B | — |
Workshop
| Interview | Speaking | Unmet needs |
|---|---|---|
| Interview D |
The question this time
What helped people speak, and which needs remained unanswered?
2 studies · 3 interviews · 5 analyses
Change the selection to update the prewritten findings below. No real analysis runs.
Each cell is an existing individual analysis. Perspectives with the same name in different studies retain their own analysis instructions.
Selected results, their analysis methods and the research designs used at the time form the basis for this synthesis.
“Taking turns in the group gave me room to finish explaining my question. But I'm still unsure what to try first afterward.”
Workshop · Interview D · Fictional material
Synthesis findings · Prewritten example
Welcome-event A couldn't find an opening. Workshop D said taking turns helped them finish their question.
Welcome-event B preferred private or written communication. More public Q&A time may not meet the need to discuss personal matters.
A wanted to apply the method in a small team. D had spoken but still lacked a first step. Both accounts leave practical questions open.
These are directions supported by the fictional material, to be explored in further research.
Longitudinal research · Planned
The plan is for later interviews to draw on the same participant’s earlier experiences, then bring answers from different times together to explore what changed and which questions remain open.
This illustrates a planned direction. Historical context in later interviews and analysis of the same participant’s changes across rounds are not yet implemented.
First round · Welcome-event interview A
Three months later · The same participant A in a follow-up study
Historical context to draw on · Planned
Wanted to apply the method in a small team, but found no opening to ask.
Before
Wanted to understand the method but had no chance to ask.
Later
Had tried it and knew how to get started.
Still to explore
How two people divide the work still needs more specific support.
Continue in Qualiask, or export de-identified interviews, analysis results and research plans for your own agent and other tools.
Your next study
A group of people you want to hear from. A question you're still figuring out. Turn it into a study you can carry out with Qualiask.
Start in your browser, or connect your own agent.